So
often, in fairy tales, a protagonist is given an object or charm that will
later prove to be of enormous importance in accomplishing a task or completing
a journey. And just as often, the object
is forgotten and remains out of sight until its purpose is revealed. When it is needed, the object suddenly reemerges
as if out of nowhere. Memories also do
this. They return when they are
needed. This may happen when one is
writing a story—a memory appears that may be conveniently incorporated into a plot
or may even serve to form the framework for a story that is going nowhere. But memories can also be useful in other circumstances. To have one appear at just the right time,
even though it has perhaps been buried for decades, is like the mysterious reappearance
of the magical object entrusted to the fairy tale character at a time when he
or she attached little importance to it.
The event that is being recalled may have seemed inconsequential at the
time it actually occurred, but when it reappears as an “involuntary memory” at precisely
the proper moment, it can be paradigm-shattering. In his wonderful book Arrow of God,
one of Chinua Achebe’s characters speaks the proverb, “When we see an old woman
stop in her dance to point again and again in the same direction we can be sure
that somewhere there something happened long ago which touched the roots of her
life.” Considering this proverb
carefully, I perceive an ambiguity. Perhaps
it was the event that occurred long ago which touched the roots of her life,
but it is also possible that only the memory of it has affected her that way. Memory can be like a kind of angel that unexpectedly
descends on us, sometimes bringing precious gifts: wisdom, insight, joy,
reconciliation, comfort, and healing.
Die Geisterwelt ist uns in der Tat schon aufgeschlossen, sie ist immer offenbar --Novalis
Saturday, June 27, 2020
Sunday, May 31, 2020
Pentecost
Treib
ihn von dir in unsern Arm,
Daß
er von deinem Hauch noch warm;
In
schweren Wolken sammle ihn
Und
laß ihn so hernieder ziehn.
In
kühlen Strömen send ihn her,
In
Feuerflammen lodre er,
In
Luft und Öl, in Klang und Tau
Durchdring
er unsrer Erde Bau.
Send him forth from you into our arms,
While he is still warmed by your breath.
Collect him in the heavy clouds
And let him come down like this.
In cooling streams, send him here,
He, in flames of fire,
In air and oil, in sound and dew,
Penetrating our earthly abode.
--from Novalis, Geistliche Lieder, XII
Friday, May 15, 2020
We Ought to Be Willing to Give a Good Interpretation to the Statement of Another . . .
It is so easy to impute bad will to others who are actually
attempting to be truthful and sincere—to deliberately not hear what they are
saying because it disturbs us, or we disagree with them, or we simply need to
be difficult. St. Ignatius of Loyola wrote
that we ought to be more willing to give a good interpretation to the statement
of another than to condemn it as false. And there is the quote attributed to St.
Thomas Aquinas: “We must love them both, those whose opinions we share and
those whose opinions we reject. For both
have labored in the search for truth and both have helped us in the finding of
it.” I remember the time that someone interviewed me about fair trade for a
local publication (the interview was a bit of a fiasco for a number of reasons—beware
of interviews!). In the course of it, I
made the statement that the difference between folk art and fine art was (to me)
that folk art belonged more to a whole culture while fine art was the product
of the individual. It was an off-the-cuff
remark and one that I thought was pretty neutral, but, for some reason, a local
artist who read the interview became incensed by it and demanded the right to
write a rebuttal. I’m still not sure
what it was in that statement which set the artist off, as the “rebuttal” (which
was published in the next issue) never even addressed my contention. Somehow, the artist saw my statement as an
attack on fine artists. The artist
proceeded to air all sorts of grievances, which, I’m sure, were all legitimate, but
I still don’t know how any of them had anything to do with what I said. The whole affair seemed rather silly to me, and
it was certainly unusual, as people generally tend to be more generous toward
my offhand opinions than they (and I) actually deserve. So often, instead of listening to others, we
are content to box--or worse--with shadows of our own making.
Sunday, May 10, 2020
Novalis, Geistliche Lieder, XIII
Wenn
in bangen trüben Stunden
Unser
Herz beinah verzagt,
Wenn
von Krankheit überwunden
Angst
in unserm Innern nagt;
Wir
der Treugeliebten denken,
Wie
sie Gram und Kummer drückt,
Wolken
unsern Blick beschränken,
Die
kein Hoffnungsstrahl durchblickt:
O!
dann neigt sich Gott herüber,
Seine
Liebe kommt uns nah,
Sehnen
wir uns dann hinüber
Steht
sein Engel vor uns da,
Bringt
den Kelch des frischen Lebens,
Lispelt
Mut und Trost uns zu;
Und
wir beten nicht vergebens
Auch
für die Geliebten Ruh.
When,
in hours obscured by anxiety,
Our
hearts almost despairing,
When, overcome by illness,
Fear
devouring us within,
We, who
wish to be faithful, think
How faith
expresses grief and sorrow,
As clouds
limit our view,
And
allow us no ray of hope:
O!
then God hovers over us,
His
love comes close.
So
let us desire to go
With
the angel who stands before us,
Bringing
a cup of new life,
Whispering
courage and comfort--
That
we do not ask in vain
For our
beloved rest.
--Novalis,
Geistliche Lieder, XIII
Friday, April 24, 2020
Aphorism
Monday, January 27, 2020
Ideal Nature
Man steht mit der Natur gerade in so unbegreiflich verschiedenen
Verhältnissen, wie mit den Menschen; und wie sie sich dem Kinde kindisch zeigt,
und sich gefällig seinem kindlichen Herzen anschmiegt, so zeigt sie sich dem
Gotte göttlich, und stimmt zu dessen hohem Geiste.
One’s relationship to nature in unfathomably different circumstances is the same as with human beings; she shows herself childishly to the child, and nestles
pleasingly in his childlike heart, and shows herself divinely to God, in
agreement with his high Spirit.
I remember how, as a
child, I first came to know nature. It
was a magical encounter; magical, because it seemed full of a hidden potency
that could be experienced but never fully understood. I was especially overwhelmed
by three particular qualities of nature: its sensuousness, its profligacy, and its
mystery. Why did mint smell so
sweet? Why did even the humblest sparrow
seem so perfectly designed, like a flawless work of art? Why did the date palm freely offer such sweet,
earthy fruit? Why were grapes ripening in the sun so
warm and juicy? Why was the mulberry
tree covered in sweet purple fruit and sour red fruit? Why were even the leaves of chile plant so spicy
hot? Why were sunsets so spectacular? Why were trees so green? Why did the blossoms of the lantana contain
so many florets, each one perfect and unique?
In addition to the sensual richness of nature, there was all its superabundance. The mulberry tree didn’t
just make fruit, it made thousands of fruits.
The dandelions did make a single perfect sunburst, they made fields of
sunbursts. A single bird didn’t sing an incomparable
song, there were always flocks of coloratura sopranos. It all seemed a riddle to me. Why did the lantana offer so many
florets? Why did the date palm make so
many giant clusters of dates? Why did
the sunset paint the entire firmament? Nature’s
generosity was a mystery beyond compare.
But it was a joyful mystery.
Nature’s plentitude didn’t blunt its sensual power. At that time, I had no real understanding
that sickness, death, and decay were also a part of nature. And the first theology I was taught claimed
those things as products of The Fall, of purely human wickedness. They remained somehow apart from nature’s intrinsic
character—if a bird died it was because of human cruelty; if a tree died it was
because of human neglect. Wo Kinder
sind, da ist ein goldenes Zeitalter (Where children are, there is the
Golden Age), Novalis wrote. As a child,
I believed in, and also experienced, nature as it existed in the Golden Age. Like most children, I had a very active and
very rudimentary spiritual life, but it seemed to exist on a different plane than
that of nature. Morality, for example,
was a necessary part of one’s spiritual growth, but it was hard to understand how
it applied to the natural world. Birds
stole from farmers and even each other. Lions
and wolves killed to eat. Spiritual
beings could protect you from harm, but nature was indifferent to human problems. It gave what it could but had no interest in
assuring that you had everything you actually needed. It was benevolent, generous, and beautiful,
but those qualities seemed somehow separate from the same virtues in the
spiritual world.
As my spiritual understanding grew (in its
own halting, confused, and humble way—still infinitely far from a divine understanding
of things), I began to see that nature contained qualities of a spiritual
design: things like unity, order, simplicity, and perseverance, to name but a
few. I began to understand the sacramental
essence of nature. Nature was no longer
just a joyful day at the fair. It was also,
in Novalis’ words, ein Universaltropus des Geistes, ein symbolisches Bild
desselben (a universal trope of the spirit, a symbolic picture of it).
Saturday, January 4, 2020
Happy New Year
Walking through Skid Row
on my way to the Greyhound station
January 3rd, 2020
in apocalyptic L.A.
which is too excited in the head
and too tired at its feet
a homeless woman--
who looked like a frontier settler
or an Arctic explorer--
was moving her tent
(a group of officers stood by)
and she wished me a Happy New Year
not bitterly
not with irony
but with genuine goodwill
and I thought of Richard Brautigan
how he would have made a poem out of it
on my way to the Greyhound station
January 3rd, 2020
in apocalyptic L.A.
which is too excited in the head
and too tired at its feet
a homeless woman--
who looked like a frontier settler
or an Arctic explorer--
was moving her tent
(a group of officers stood by)
and she wished me a Happy New Year
not bitterly
not with irony
but with genuine goodwill
and I thought of Richard Brautigan
how he would have made a poem out of it
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

